Since I’m not a Democrat, I’m indifferent to the primary elections dominating the headlines. As I have no ability to impact the result of those elections, I won’t discuss them. Instead, I’d like to look at a matter closer to home. Springfield Public Schools has requested a levy for funding to support the Springfield public schools. The past three attempts to pass such a levy have failed. Perhaps, one might wonder, the school system would recognize that additional funding from increasing the tax rate will continue to fail. Perhaps, one may then conclude, the schools would seek alternate avenues of securing funding, and set a precedent for the Toledo community—along with the State of Ohio. But status quo, my friends, status quo prevails. Hopefully, status quo will continue to include a rejection of the levy.
There are two primary reasons that these ballot measures should fail, and a third reason that I feel they should fail, though I recognize some may disagree.
The taxation of property owners is unjust, and represents the kind of ‘taxation without representation’ that led to the birth of a nation. Let me pose a hypothetical situation. My neighbor and I earn the same amount of money annually, live in homes that assessed at the same value, and pay our taxes accurately, including property taxes which are used to fund local schools and are increased levies. Now suppose I have no children. Also suppose my neighbor has two and sends them to the local public schools. In this situation, not only will I receive no direct benefit for my contribution to the local public schools, I will contribute more than my neighbor who receives significant direct benefits from his contribution. My neighbor will contribute less, because he will be eligible to receive tax credits for having children. Though, I may receive some marginal intangible benefit from a community with more intelligent children—who may be better behaved and more economically productive in the long-run for their education—this benefit is marginalized by the direct benefit observed by those who receive services rendered by the schools. Additionally, I will be further penalized by more taxation for paying for improvements to my residence that increases its value relative to my neighbor’s residence, as I will pay more in the short-run in sales taxes for the improvements, but more in the long-run for property taxes, for which I will not receive full benefit. Finally, both my neighbor and I will be paying taxes on property which may be taken by local government under eminent domain.
No empirical dataset has been produced to indicate that a greater amount of money spent on public education produces greater amounts of educational success. It also holds that no relationship exists between smaller classroom sizes and greater educational success. And it’s not for a lack of trying, either. To the contrary, studies have been authored attempting to prove that these correlations exist. But schools are one example of the common wisdom that simply throwing money into a situation does not guarantee that the situation will improve.
Rather than funding schools through monies extracted from local taxpayers in the form of property taxes, the funding for schools should be derived from the people utilizing the schools’ services. This leads to my argument that all schools should be private, and government run schools should not be the universal standard. I realize this perspective perfectly contradicts the status quo, and scares a lot of people. But consider the private schools that exist in your community, and compare them to the public ones. Consider the complete lack of accountability in public schools, and the inability of all taxpayers to affect change on their local schools. Consider the lack of diversity in perspective offered by state legislated curricula. Finally, consider this toolbag:
And consider the fact that he’s teaching again; in public schools. Way to go, Colorado—the state that brings us esteemed public educators, and the rape of a handicapped girl in a school stairwell during school hours.
2 Comments:
Hmm... you make some good points and some less good point. I think, however, your utimate point of privatizing schools is short-sighted. I'm sure you've head this before, but it just wouldn't work. I can't say that public schools are perfect, as that obviously aren't, but the alternative doesn't work either.
Consider this. You idea is to leave is to the 'invisible hand' of the free market, no? Well, what's the profitability of educating poor inner city kids? None, and this is obvious. The end result would be a society stratified even more by economic class. People in poorer classes would have no hope of social mobility because no amount of hard work would get them an education they couldn't afford. Right now, tough as it may be, American society is very mobile with enough hard work. In that situation, it would be literally impossible.
As much as it may pain ultra-capitalists, there are some socialist-looking programs that are very essential to this country. Not all that are there are necessary, and almost none are run well, but it's better to have it poorly run than not there at all.
That doesn't, however, excuse the awful state of public schools in this country. As one of the wealthiest nations, and one always bragging about being the 'best', our schools should be a national embarassment. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but everything from literacy rates to math skills are terrible. In most cases, we fall behind a majority of the developed world. It's sickening.
As to Jay Bennish, he's an asshole. Assholes are everywhere. We don't know the full story, though. Did he apologize? Did he at least agree not to do anything this stupid again? Has he changed? He shouldn't be banned for life from doing his job because of one incident.
(The last sentence doesn't apply to kid-touchers. They should be locked up and the key throw away.)
By
X, at 12:19 PM
Wow. Sorry about the typos. I should check these before I post them...
By
X, at 12:20 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home