Hillary Maligns Republicans, Shows Own Ignorance
Mark Belling made some fantastic points on Rush Limbaugh’s program earlier today that I believe need to be reinforced. Belling found the comments made by Senator Hillary Clinton yesterday particularly infuriating—and rightly so. Senator Clinton, who compared the Republican led House of Representatives to a “plantation,” during a Martin Luther King, Jr. celebration in Harlem. Democrats supported her remarks, and this story co-led most nightly news programs alongside former Vice President Al Gore’s remarks on the Bush administration’s “domestic spying program”—a title that is as misleading as basically everything else reported by major media outlets.
But Senator Clinton is clearly incorrect. Incorrect to the point she either must be: 1) vapid, unintelligent, incapable of coming up with logical ideas and concepts, or 2) lying specifically for the sake of advancing a specific agenda for the purpose of asserting her own political power.
What’s the evidence to support those claims? Let’s compare party leadership roles of the “Plantation Republicans” and the “Opportunity Democrats.” In the last election, around 90% of blacks aligned themselves with Democrats, and about that same percentage voted for Senator Kerry for President. So the Democrats should look to roughly 90% of blacks as a major portion of their constituency. Now, how many blacks are in major positions of leadership in the Democratic party? Senator Baraq Obama of Illinois, unelected leaders like Rev. Jackson and Rev. Sharpton, and some governor positions like Mayor Ray Nagin, whose name is only known because of his ignorant remarks and inept and uninspired leadership in the face of crisis. If you look back at the Clinton administration, now 5 years in the history books, minorities held cabinet positions including: Sec. of Labor, Sec. of Veterans' Affairs, Sec. of Energy, and Sec. of HUD. Naturally I had to look these up, because no one ever talked about any of them except lauding Clinton for appointing ‘so many minorities.’
Now, the Bush administration: 2 black secretaries of state, 1 black Sec. of HUD, Asian Sec. of Transportation, Asian Sec. of Labor, Hispanic Sec. of Commece, and Hispanic Attorney General. Also note that the one black Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas—was appointed by the elder President Bush.
So, in other words, the white Democrat leadership claims to support issues important to blacks, and the Republican leadership does not support blacks, because they put blacks in prominent positions where they can affect changes on their own behalf.
So how about that Hillary in ’08? I hope people remember this kind of stuff when that campaign wheel starts rolling.
5 Comments:
What an excellent point hitchman! It was good to see you and your alfredo pizza combination last night. HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO!
By
Anonymous, at 2:03 PM
did you just call me a communist?
anyways, out of curiosity, what is your take on the nation's “domestic spying program”?
oh, and let's try to keep in mind that there are actual reasons why black communities don't vote republican. with that said, let it be known that i really don't care for hillary. luckily she doesn't have a chance.
By
clavin, at 12:58 AM
I disagree, Hillary does have a chance. I also disagree that htere are 'actual reasons' blacks don't vote republican. I think that there are actual avenues of disinformation and apathy that lead to blacks voting democrat.
As for the 'domestic spying prorgam,' it is one of the better media misnomers I have heard in a while. Indeed, where the DoHS spying specifically and only on Americans, I could see there being a potential conflict of interest. But, if the wires tapped are strictly international calls to individuals with suspected ties to terrorists or terrorist orgs, including many domestic residents here illegally, then I take little issue with the policy.
I mean, it's not like I'm phoning Iran on a weekly basis, what do I care? To take issue with this policy now, when the threat of terrorism is more salient than it was when wire tapping was used by previous administrations, is to me, absurd.
By
Hickmania, at 11:03 AM
i'm not so sure hillary will be able to muster up any kind of following in the south.
secondly, it sounds like you're saying that the only reason many black voters don't allign w/ republican values is because they are misinformed. now i read, understand, & agree with most of your initial argument about intentional misdirection by certain democrats who try to play huey newton while attacking the GOP as "the man", but let's not try and pretend that the only reason that the left gets the majority of the black vote is because they've tricked them into believing that they are their friends. the argument can also be made that condi rice is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt at reaching out to the minority population.
lastly, are tapped wires strictly on the phones of suspected terrorists and not just people who have difficult to pronounce names? (that's a serious question, not just rhetoric). i agree that it's silly to be upset about wire taps now and not in the past, but i hardly see how that makes the issue as a whole acceptable.
By
clavin, at 4:37 PM
In WWII, we interned anyone with ties to Japan. It didn't matter if they were Japanese sympathizers, we threw them into camps. But we loved FDR, so that was okay. President Bush, in the War on Terror, attempts to intercept enemy comminique via tapping phone lines of international calls. And yet, given the media reaction to the 'domestic spying program', the greatest misnomer of the past 30 days or so (because 12 miners found alive is hard to top), you would think that W himself is personally shooting the people placing the calls, and throwing the recipients into jail.
Actually, that's more of a Che thing. Did I mention that he's my hero? Check out my Che t-shirt and AK-47...
By
Hickmania, at 4:44 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home